This page is the syllabus. The full course is inside.
- 15 full-length lessons at doctoral depth, a focused reading of 25 to 40 minutes each, not summaries
- Interactive course assistant beside every lesson, grounded in this country's laws and standards
- Slide deck and study guide included with the course
- English
- Verifiable certificate on completion, 6 clock hours, lesson topics on its face
Rationale
The KMK strategy "Bildung in der digitalen Welt" (2016) established a binding cross-subject competence framework that all Länder have transposed into their curricula. The 2021 supplement "Lehren und Lernen in der digitalen Welt" extended the strategy to teaching quality and school development, and the 2019 digital amendment to the KMK Standards added digital-teaching competences to the four competence areas Unterrichten, Erziehen, Beurteilen and Innovieren. German teachers must now demonstrate competence in media didactics, data protection, online child safety and digital assessment. This course addresses the full spectrum of the digital mandate, from the legal framework of the KMK strategy through classroom practice to whole-school media-education planning. It is designed to be countable toward the statutory CPD duty where the Land and school leadership recognise external providers, and it maps directly to the digital competence areas that appear in Land CPD catalogues and the DigitalPakt school-funding requirements.
Part I: Foundations (Lessons 1-4)
Lesson 1. The KMK digital strategy and its binding competence framework
The lesson opens with the 2016 KMK strategy "Bildung in der digitalen Welt" as the foundational document for digital education in Germany. Participants examine the six competence areas that every learner must acquire: Suchen, Verarbeiten und Aufbewahren; Kommunizieren und Kooperieren; Produzieren und Praesentieren; Schuetzen und sicher Agieren; Problemloesen und Handeln; Analysieren und Reflektieren. The lesson traces how each Land transposed these competences into its own curriculum and how the teacher's role shifts from transmitter to facilitator of digital literacy. Participants analyse a sample Land curriculum document to identify where the six competence areas appear and discuss what this means for lesson planning. The session concludes with a self-audit of the participant's own digital competence against the KMK framework, identifying gaps that the course will address.
Lesson 2. Teaching and learning in the digital world
This lesson examines the 2021 KMK supplement "Lehren und Lernen in der digitalen Welt" and its additions to the original strategy. Participants study the supplement's three pillars: teaching quality in digital settings, school development through digital means, and the professionalisation of teachers for digital teaching. The lesson contrasts the 2016 strategy's learner-competence focus with the 2021 supplement's emphasis on teaching quality and school organisation. Participants work through a case study of a school that implemented the supplement's recommendations, evaluating the changes in teaching practice and school leadership. The session includes a structured discussion of how the supplement reframes the teacher's professional obligation under the Innovieren competence area of the KMK Standards, positioning digital development as a continuous professional duty.
Lesson 3. The teacher's digital competence
Participants examine the 2019 digital amendment to the KMK Standards for Teacher Education, which added digital-teaching competences to all four competence areas. The lesson breaks down what the amendment requires for Unterrichten (using digital tools for instruction), Erziehen (digital citizenship and online safety), Beurteilen (digital assessment and diagnostics) and Innovieren (digital professional development and school innovation). Participants map their current practice against the amended Standards, identifying specific competences they need to develop. The session includes a comparative analysis of how the amendment aligns with the European Commission's DigCompEdu framework, though the lesson remains anchored in the German KMK document. Participants leave with a personal development plan linked to the amended Standards.
Lesson 4. Media didactics versus media education
This lesson establishes the conceptual distinction between teaching with media (media didactics) and teaching about media (media education), both of which the KMK strategy requires. Participants study the German tradition of Medienpaedagogik and how the KMK 2016 strategy integrates both dimensions. The lesson presents a taxonomy of digital teaching methods: substitution, augmentation, modification and redefinition (the SAMR model adapted to the German context). Participants evaluate sample lesson plans to determine whether they use digital tools for substitution or for genuine transformation of learning. The session includes a guided analysis of a Land Medienbildungskonzept to see how the distinction between didactics and education is operationalised in school planning. Participants practise writing a lesson objective that explicitly addresses both a subject-content goal and a media-education goal.
Part II: Core Practice (Lessons 5-10)
Lesson 5. Data protection in the classroom
Participants study the legal framework for handling pupil data under the EU-DSGVO (GDPR) and its German implementation through the Land data-protection statutes. The lesson covers the principles of data minimisation, purpose limitation and consent, with specific attention to the school context where consent is often given by parents or by the school as a legal obligation. Participants work through scenarios: using cloud-based learning platforms, storing pupil work, sharing grades via email, and using video-conferencing tools. The session includes the legal basis for processing special categories of data (health information, special educational needs status) under Art. 9 DSGVO. Participants practise writing a data-protection notice for a digital learning activity and learn how to consult the Land data-protection officer (Landesbeauftragter fuer Datenschutz). The lesson emphasises that data protection is a teacher's legal duty, not an optional extra.
Lesson 6. Copyright and open educational resources
This lesson covers the lawful use of materials in digital teaching under German copyright law, specifically § 60a UrhG (Urheberrechtsgesetz) which permits the use of up to 15 percent of a work for teaching purposes. Participants learn the limits of this exception and when they must seek permission or use licensed materials. The lesson introduces open educational resources (OER) as a solution, covering the KMK OER guidance and the main German OER repositories (such as wirlernenonline.de and the OER content of the Landesbildungsserver). Participants practise finding, evaluating and attributing OER for a specific subject and year group. The session includes a discussion of Creative Commons licences and how to choose the right licence for self-produced materials. Participants leave with a checklist for lawful material use and a list of trusted OER sources.
Lesson 7. Online child safety and safeguarding
Participants examine the intersection of digital education with the child-protection mandate under § 8a SGB VIII and the Jugendmedienschutz-Staatsvertrag (JMStV). The lesson covers the risks learners face online: grooming, exposure to harmful content, cyberstalking and data exploitation. Participants study the teacher's duty to act when a learner discloses online abuse or when weighty indications of endangerment arise from digital interactions. The session includes the role of the insoweit erfahrene Fachkraft in digital safeguarding cases and the school's responsibility to include online safety in its Schutzkonzept. Participants work through a case study of a learner who has been groomed through a social-media platform, applying the § 8a procedural pathway. The lesson emphasises that digital safeguarding is not separate from general safeguarding but an extension of the same legal duty.
Lesson 8. Cyberbullying and school response
This lesson addresses the prevention of and response to cyberbullying, which falls under the Erziehen competence area of the KMK Standards and the KMK democracy resolution. Participants study the legal definition of cyberbullying under Land Schulgesetz and the school's duty to intervene. The lesson presents a staged response protocol: documentation, separation of involved parties, conversation with the affected learner, conversation with the perpetrator, notification of parents, and, where appropriate, involvement of the school social worker or police. Participants practise conducting a structured conversation with a learner who has been cyberbullied, using trauma-sensitive communication techniques. The session includes a whole-school prevention framework: teaching digital citizenship, establishing clear rules for digital behaviour, and creating a reporting system that learners trust. Participants leave with a template for a school cyberbullying response plan.
Lesson 9. Disinformation and source criticism
Participants study the KMK 2016 competence area Analysieren und Reflektieren, which requires learners to analyse and evaluate digital information critically. The lesson covers the phenomenon of disinformation, its forms (misinformation, malinformation, deepfakes) and its impact on democratic discourse. Participants learn practical classroom methods for teaching source criticism: the CRAAP test adapted for German media, lateral reading, and verification through fact-checking organisations (such as Correctiv and dpa fact check). The session includes a workshop where participants evaluate a set of online sources for a given topic, applying the verification techniques. The lesson connects to the KMK democracy resolution by framing disinformation as a threat to democratic participation that schools must address. Participants leave with a lesson plan template for teaching source criticism in their subject.
Lesson 10. Digital assessment and feedback
This lesson examines the use of digital tools for assessment and feedback, anchored in the Beurteilen competence area of the KMK Standards and the 2021 supplement. Participants study the principles of valid, fair and transparent digital assessment: ensuring that digital tools measure learning outcomes rather than digital literacy, preventing cheating through assessment design, and providing timely feedback. The lesson covers formative assessment tools (digital quizzes, polls, collaborative documents) and summative assessment tools (digital portfolios, e-exams, automated scoring). Participants evaluate a set of digital assessment tools against pedagogical and legal criteria, including data protection and accessibility. The session includes a workshop on designing a digital assessment task that separates content mastery from digital competence. Participants leave with a rubric for evaluating digital assessment tools and a template for a digital assessment plan.
Part III: Application and Mastery (Lessons 11-15)
Lesson 11. Accessibility and digital inclusion
Participants study the requirement under UN-BRK Art. 9 (accessibility) and the inclusion amendment to the KMK Standards to ensure that digital learning is accessible to all learners. The lesson covers the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and their German implementation through the Barrierefreiheitsstaerkungsgesetz. Participants learn practical strategies: providing alt text for images, ensuring video captions, using accessible document formats, and choosing learning platforms that meet accessibility standards. The session includes a workshop where participants audit a digital learning resource for accessibility barriers and propose modifications. The lesson connects digital inclusion to the broader inclusion mandate under the KMK 2011 inclusion resolution, emphasising that digital tools can either reduce or increase barriers for learners with disabilities. Participants leave with an accessibility checklist for digital teaching materials.
Lesson 12. Selecting and evaluating digital tools
This lesson provides a systematic framework for selecting and evaluating digital tools for teaching, based on pedagogical, legal and technical criteria. Participants study the KMK 2021 supplement's guidance on tool selection and the Land data-protection review duties that require schools to assess tools before adoption. The lesson presents a multi-criteria evaluation matrix: pedagogical fit, data protection compliance, accessibility, cost, technical support and alignment with the school Medienbildungskonzept. Participants apply the matrix to a set of common digital tools (learning management systems, quiz tools, video platforms, collaboration tools) and discuss the trade-offs involved. The session includes the legal requirement under the DSGVO to conduct a data-protection impact assessment for high-risk tools. Participants leave with a completed evaluation of one tool and a template for future evaluations.
Lesson 13. The school media-education plan (Medienbildungskonzept)
Participants study the structure and purpose of the school media-education plan (Medienbildungskonzept), which the KMK 2016 strategy and the DigitalPakt Schule funding programme require. The lesson covers the four components of a Medienbildungskonzept: the pedagogical vision (what digital competences learners should acquire), the professional-development plan (how teachers will build their digital competence), the equipment and infrastructure plan (what hardware and software the school needs), and the implementation timeline. Participants analyse a sample Medienbildungskonzept from a Land model school and evaluate its strengths and gaps. The session includes a workshop where participants draft one component of a Medienbildungskonzept for their own school context. The lesson emphasises that the Medienbildungskonzept is a living document that must be reviewed and updated regularly, and that it is the key document for accessing DigitalPakt funding.
Lesson 14. Blended and hybrid teaching lessons from the pandemic
This lesson examines the quality criteria for blended and hybrid teaching that emerged from the pandemic experience and that the KMK 2021 supplement codified. Participants study the research on effective distance and hybrid teaching: the importance of synchronous and asynchronous balance, the need for clear communication structures, the role of social presence and community building, and the challenges of assessment in hybrid settings. The lesson presents a quality framework for hybrid teaching derived from the KMK supplement and Land evaluations of pandemic teaching. Participants analyse a case study of a school that implemented a successful hybrid teaching model, identifying the factors that contributed to its success. The session includes a workshop where participants design a hybrid lesson for their subject, addressing the specific challenges of their school context. Participants leave with a checklist for quality hybrid teaching and a template for a hybrid lesson plan.
Lesson 15. Evaluating digital school development
The final lesson addresses the evaluation of digital school development using evidence, anchored in the KMK 2021 supplement and the Land Orientierungsrahmen Schulqualitaet (school-quality framework). Participants study the indicators that Land quality frameworks use to assess digital development: learner competence outcomes, teacher digital competence, infrastructure use, and the integration of digital tools into teaching and learning. The lesson presents evaluation methods: surveys of learners and teachers, analysis of digital assessment data, review of the Medienbildungskonzept implementation, and external evaluation through school inspection. Participants work through a simulated evaluation of a school's digital development, applying the Land quality framework to a set of data. The session concludes with participants writing a personal action plan for their own digital professional development, linked to the Innovieren competence area and the statutory CPD duty. Participants leave with a completed self-evaluation and a plan for the next CPD cycle.
This syllabus was designed from primary-source research of this nation's official teacher requirements and passed independent verification. The full course, its lessons, assistant, and materials are live for enrolled educators.