This page is the syllabus. The full course is inside.
- 15 full-length lessons at doctoral depth, a focused reading of 25 to 40 minutes each, not summaries
- Interactive course assistant beside every lesson, grounded in this country's laws and standards
- Slide deck and study guide included with the course
- English
- Verifiable certificate on completion, 6 clock hours, lesson topics on its face
Rationale
Colombia operates a mandatory Sistema Nacional de Convivencia Escolar under Ley 1620 de 2013 and Decreto 1965 de 2013, obligating every school to implement the Ruta de Atencion Integral for coexistence, human-rights education, and prevention of school violence. Simultaneously, Ley 1098 de 2006 (Codigo de la Infancia y la Adolescencia) imposes statutory detection and reporting duties on educators for child maltreatment, abuse, exploitation, and sexual violence, and requires the state to train staff to recognize warning signs. These two legal frameworks intersect in daily practice: a teacher who detects a Tipo III situation must activate both the Ruta de Atencion Integral and the mandatory reporting pathway. The course equips participants to discharge these duties with legal precision, document incidents correctly, and embed prevention culture into the Proyecto Educativo Institucional. It is the single most legally consequential CPD offering for Colombian educators because failure to comply carries professional and criminal liability.
Part I: Foundations (Lessons 1-4)
Lesson 1. The coexistence system
Participants examine the purpose, structure, and legal basis of the Sistema Nacional de Convivencia Escolar created by Ley 1620 de 2013. The lesson traces the system from the national level (MEN, ICBF, Fiscalia, and the national convivencia committee) down to the territorial and school levels, clarifying the chain of responsibility. Participants analyze the system's four components: promotion of human-rights and sexuality education, prevention of violence, attention to situations that affect coexistence, and monitoring and follow-up. A case study of a school that successfully implemented the system is used to illustrate how the components interact. By the end of the lesson, participants can diagram the system's structure and identify the institutional actors they must coordinate with in their own school.
Lesson 2. The Ruta de Atencion Integral
Participants study the four-component Ruta de Atencion Integral that every school must operationalize: promotion, prevention, attention, and monitoring. The lesson breaks down each component into concrete actions: promotion includes classroom activities on derechos humanos, sexuales, y reproductivos; prevention includes early-warning mechanisms; attention includes the protocols for each situation type; monitoring includes documentation and follow-up. Participants work through a scenario in which a school must design its ruta from scratch, identifying which actions belong to which component and how the components sequence. By the end of the lesson, participants can map the ruta to their school's existing practices and identify gaps.
Lesson 3. The school coexistence committee
Participants examine the composition, mandate, and legal obligations of the school coexistence committee (comite de convivencia escolar) under Ley 1620 de 2013 and Decreto 1965 de 2013. The lesson covers who must sit on the committee (rector, orientador, teacher representative, student representative, parent representative), how often it must meet, and what decisions it can make. Special attention is given to the committee's role in updating the manual de convivencia and in handling Tipo II and III situations. Participants analyze a sample committee meeting agenda and minutes, then draft a resolution for a hypothetical situation. By the end of the lesson, participants can convene and run a committee meeting in compliance with the law.
Lesson 4. Situation typology
Participants learn the three-tier classification of situations that affect school coexistence under Decreto 1965 de 2013: Tipo I (conflicts handled by teachers and students through dialogue and pedagogy), Tipo II (aggression, bullying, cyberbullying requiring committee intervention), and Tipo III (crimes including sexual violence, physical assault causing injury, and threats to life, requiring immediate reporting to authorities). The lesson uses real anonymized cases to practice classification, emphasizing the legal consequences of misclassifying a Tipo III as a Tipo II. Participants complete a classification exercise with ten scenarios and justify each decision. By the end of the lesson, participants can correctly classify any situation they encounter and activate the correct protocol.
Part II: Core Practice (Lessons 5-10)
Lesson 5. Bullying and cyberbullying protocols
Participants study the specific protocols for acoso escolar and ciberacoso under Ley 1620 de 2013, distinguishing bullying from isolated conflict. The lesson covers the legal definition of bullying (repeated, intentional, power-imbalanced aggression), the obligation to document each incident, and the role of the comite de convivencia in investigating and imposing corrective measures. Cyberbullying receives special attention because it often occurs outside school hours yet affects the school environment; participants learn how to coordinate with families and, when necessary, with technology platforms. A case study of a cyberbullying incident guides participants through the full protocol from detection to follow-up. By the end of the lesson, participants can implement the bullying protocol and advise students and families on prevention.
Lesson 6. Human-rights and sexuality education
Participants examine the mandate under Ley 1620 de 2013 for schools to provide education on derechos humanos, sexuales, y reproductivos as part of the promotion component of the Ruta de Atencion Integral. The lesson clarifies that this is not optional content but a statutory obligation that must be integrated into the plan de estudios and the PEI. Participants review the MEN's guidelines for age-appropriate sexuality education and discuss how to address controversial topics with families while respecting the child's right to information. A workshop activity has participants design a grade-level lesson on derechos sexuales y reproductivos that aligns with the Estandares Basicos de Competencias Ciudadanas. By the end of the lesson, participants can plan and deliver human-rights and sexuality education that complies with the law.
Lesson 7. The Codigo de la Infancia in the classroom
Participants study the educator's protection duties under Ley 1098 de 2006 (Codigo de la Infancia y la Adolescencia), which establishes that children and adolescents are subjects of rights and that all adults, especially those in educational settings, have a duty to protect them. The lesson covers the key principles: the interes superior del nino (best interest of the child), the primacy of rights, and the corresponsability of family, society, and the state. Participants analyze the specific articles that impose duties on educational institutions: Article 44 (duty to train staff), Article 45 (obligation to report), and Article 46 (prohibition of corporal punishment and degrading treatment). A guided reading of the Codigo's relevant sections ensures participants can locate the legal text themselves. By the end of the lesson, participants can articulate their legal duties under the Codigo and identify when those duties are triggered.
Lesson 8. Defining maltrato infantil
Participants learn the statutory definition of maltrato infantil under Ley 1098 de 2006, which covers physical maltreatment, psychological or emotional abuse, negligence or abandonment, and sexual abuse. The lesson distinguishes each type with concrete examples from educational settings: physical (hitting, shaking), psychological (humiliation, threats, isolation), negligence (failure to provide food, medical care, or supervision), and sexual (contact and non-contact offenses). Participants practice identifying maltreatment in anonymized vignettes, paying attention to cultural contexts that may normalize certain behaviors without excusing them. The lesson emphasizes that the educator's duty is to detect and report, not to investigate or adjudicate. By the end of the lesson, participants can recognize the four types of maltreatment and distinguish them from lawful discipline or cultural practices.
Lesson 9. Detection
Participants study the warning signs that the state is legally required to train educators to recognize under Ley 1098 de 2006. The lesson covers physical indicators (bruises, burns, malnutrition), behavioral indicators (withdrawal, aggression, regressive behavior, sexualized behavior), and contextual indicators (family history of violence, substance abuse, poverty that meets the threshold of negligence). Participants learn that detection is a professional duty, not an option, and that failure to recognize signs can lead to continued harm. A workshop uses photographs and case narratives to practice detection in a simulated classroom context. The lesson also addresses the emotional impact on educators who detect abuse and provides strategies for self-care and collegial support. By the end of the lesson, participants can identify warning signs and document their observations in a manner that supports later reporting.
Lesson 10. The duty to report
Participants study the legal obligation to report suspected maltreatment under Ley 1098 de 2006, including when to give aviso (immediate notification) versus denuncia (formal complaint), and to whom. The lesson clarifies that the duty falls on every educator individually, not just on the school leader or the orientador, and that failure to report can result in professional sanctions and criminal liability. Participants learn the difference between reporting to the ICBF (for protection measures), the Comisaria de Familia (for family-based interventions), the Policia de Infancia y Adolescencia (for emergency protection), and the Fiscalia (for criminal investigation). A simulation exercise has participants draft a report for a hypothetical Tipo III situation, ensuring it includes all legally required elements. By the end of the lesson, participants can file a report that meets the legal standard and protects both the child and themselves.
Part III: Application and Mastery (Lessons 11-15)
Lesson 11. Reporting pathways
Participants examine the specific reporting pathways established by Ley 1098 de 2006, learning the jurisdiction and procedures of each competent authority: ICBF (linea 141, regional offices), Comisarias de Familia (municipal level), Policia de Infancia y Adolescencia (emergency response), and Fiscalia General de la Nacion (criminal investigation). The lesson includes a flowchart exercise in which participants trace a case from detection through the correct pathway, identifying which authority to contact based on the situation's severity and the child's circumstances. Participants also learn how to document the report for their own records and for the school's seguimiento file. A guest speaker from a local Comisaria de Familia (via recorded interview) explains common mistakes educators make in reporting. By the end of the lesson, participants can navigate the reporting system confidently and correctly.
Lesson 12. Confidentiality and the child's best interest
Participants study the legal and ethical obligations surrounding confidentiality when handling disclosures of abuse or violence under Ley 1098 de 2006. The lesson emphasizes the principle of the interes superior del nino, which requires that all actions prioritize the child's safety and well-being over institutional reputation, family privacy, or the educator's personal relationships. Participants learn what information must remain confidential (the child's identity, details of the abuse) and what must be shared (the report to authorities, information needed for the Ruta de Atencion Integral). A case study of a teacher who shared details with colleagues who were not on the committee illustrates the risks of breaching confidentiality. Participants practice responding to a student's disclosure using a script that balances empathy, legal duty, and confidentiality. By the end of the lesson, participants can handle sensitive disclosures without violating the law or the child's trust.
Lesson 13. Coordinating coexistence and protection
Participants learn how to interface the Ruta de Atencion Integral from Ley 1620 de 2013 with the mandatory reporting duties under Ley 1098 de 2006. The lesson uses a complex case study: a student discloses sexual abuse at home, which is a Tipo III situation under Decreto 1965 de 2013 and a reportable crime under Ley 1098 de 2006. Participants must activate both frameworks simultaneously: convene the comite de convivencia, report to the Fiscalia, notify the ICBF, and initiate the seguimiento component of the ruta. The lesson emphasizes that the two frameworks are complementary, not contradictory, and that coordination prevents gaps in protection. Participants map the overlapping timelines and responsibilities in a group exercise. By the end of the lesson, participants can execute a coordinated response that satisfies both legal mandates.
Lesson 14. Documentation and the follow-up (seguimiento) component
Participants study the documentation and monitoring requirements of the Ruta de Atencion Integral under Ley 1620 de 2013, focusing on the seguimiento component that tracks outcomes after an incident. The lesson covers what must be documented (incident reports, committee minutes, actions taken, referrals made, follow-up dates), how long records must be kept, and who has access. Participants learn to use the MEN's recommended formats for incident reporting and follow-up tracking. A workshop has participants complete a seguimiento file for a hypothetical Tipo II situation, including initial report, committee resolution, follow-up actions, and closure. The lesson also addresses how documentation serves as evidence for the evaluacion de desempeno and ECDF. By the end of the lesson, participants can maintain a legally sound documentation system for coexistence and protection cases.
Lesson 15. Prevention culture in the school
Participants synthesize the course content into a whole-school prevention culture that embeds coexistence and protection into everyday practice and the Proyecto Educativo Institucional under Ley 115 de 1994. The lesson covers how to integrate the Ruta de Atencion Integral, the manual de convivencia, and the Catedra de la Paz into a coherent institutional framework that prevents situations before they escalate. Participants develop a draft action plan for their own school, identifying priority areas, timelines, and responsible actors. The lesson also addresses how to train colleagues and engage families in prevention, creating a shared culture of protection. A final reflection asks participants to identify the single most important change they will make in their practice. By the end of the lesson, participants can lead the implementation of a prevention culture that meets all legal requirements and improves the school climate.
This syllabus was designed from primary-source research of this nation's official teacher requirements and passed independent verification. The full course, its lessons, assistant, and materials are live for enrolled educators.