This page is the syllabus. The full course is inside.
- 15 full-length lessons at doctoral depth, a focused reading of 25 to 40 minutes each, not summaries
- Interactive course assistant beside every lesson, grounded in this country's laws and standards
- Slide deck and study guide included with the course
- English
- Verifiable certificate on completion, 6 clock hours, lesson topics on its face
Rationale
ESI is the single highest-value CPD topic in Argentina because it is legally mandatory in every school from initial level upward, carries a permanent and free teacher-training obligation, and creates a formal school-level role (the ESI reference team) that teachers can occupy for career advancement. Ley 26.150 establishes ESI as a student right and a teacher duty, not an elective subject. Res. CFE 340/18 defines the priority learning cores (Nucleos de Aprendizaje Prioritario) by level and requires each school to organize an ESI reference teaching team. A teacher who completes this course can credibly claim to have met the federal training mandate, can serve or prepare to serve on the school ESI team, and can present the certificate to a jurisdictional classification board as an accreditable antecedent under Res. CFE 257/15. The course is grounded entirely in the governing instruments and avoids any AI-themed content.
Part I: Foundations (Lessons 1-4)
Lesson 1. The legal architecture of ESI. Why ESI is a student right and a teacher duty, not an elective.
Participants examine the full text of Ley 26.150, focusing on Articles 1 through 5, which establish the Programa Nacional de Educacion Sexual Integral as a permanent state policy, define the right of all students in all schools (state and private, from initial level upward) to receive comprehensive sexuality education, and mandate permanent and free teacher training in ESI as part of continuing teacher education. The lesson traces the legislative intent: ESI is not a curriculum add-on but a legally enforceable right that creates correlative duties for the state to provide training and for teachers to implement the program. Participants analyze the distinction between ESI as a student right and ESI as a teacher duty, and they identify the legal consequences of non-implementation. A guided reading activity requires participants to locate and paraphrase the key operative clauses of the law. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain to a colleague or a parent why ESI is mandatory, not optional, and can cite the specific articles that ground that obligation.
Lesson 2. The five conceptual pillars (ejes) of ESI. Gender perspective, respect for diversity, care of the body and health, affectivity, exercise of rights.
Participants study the five conceptual pillars that structure the national ESI program framework as published by the Ministry of Education and educ.ar: gender perspective, respect for diversity, care of the body and health, affectivity, and the exercise of rights. Each pillar is examined for its conceptual content, its legal grounding in Ley 26.150, and its practical implications for classroom practice. The lesson uses a comparative analysis activity in which participants map each pillar to a specific article of Ley 26.150 or to a provision of Res. CFE 340/18. Participants then discuss how the pillars function as an integrated framework rather than as separate topics. By the end of the lesson, participants can name and define each of the five pillars, can explain how they relate to one another, and can identify at least one classroom application for each pillar.
Lesson 3. The comprehensive approach across the school day. Distinguishing transversal, curricular-space, and unplanned-episode entry points.
Participants learn the three entry points for ESI content delivery as defined by Res. CFE 340/18: the transversal approach (integrating ESI across all subject areas), the specific curricular space (dedicated ESI time within the school schedule), and the unplanned episode (responding to spontaneous questions, events, or disclosures). The lesson uses case studies drawn from Argentine school contexts to illustrate each entry point and to show how teachers can move fluidly among them. Participants practice identifying which entry point is appropriate for a given scenario and discuss the institutional planning required to make the transversal approach coherent rather than sporadic. A small-group exercise requires participants to design a one-week plan that uses all three entry points for a single ESI topic. By the end of the lesson, participants can distinguish the three entry points, can select the appropriate one for a given situation, and can explain how the comprehensive approach ensures that ESI is present throughout the school day.
Lesson 4. Nucleos de Aprendizaje Prioritario for the initial level. Age-appropriate ESI content for early childhood.
Participants examine the Nucleos de Aprendizaje Prioritario (NAP) for ESI at the initial level (children aged 45 days to 5 years) as defined in Res. CFE 340/18. The lesson focuses on the specific content cores: the body as a source of discovery and care, the expression of feelings and emotions, the recognition of diversity in families and bodies, and the development of self-protection skills. Participants analyze how these cores are developmentally appropriate for early childhood and how they lay the foundation for later ESI learning. A design activity requires participants to plan a single initial-level activity that addresses one NAP core while respecting the child's developmental stage and the principles of early childhood education. By the end of the lesson, participants can list the ESI NAP cores for the initial level, can explain why each core is appropriate for that age group, and can design a simple activity that addresses one core.
Part II: Core Practice (Lessons 5-10)
Lesson 5. Nucleos de Aprendizaje Prioritario for primary. Body, feelings, rights and care in the primary years.
Participants study the ESI NAP for the primary level (children aged 6 to 12 years) as defined in Res. CFE 340/18. The cores include: the body as a territory of rights, the expression and regulation of feelings, the identification of trusted adults and safe networks, the recognition of gender stereotypes, and the development of skills for self-care and mutual care. Participants compare the primary-level cores with the initial-level cores to understand the progression and deepening of content. A curriculum-mapping exercise requires participants to locate each primary-level core within a typical primary school subject (such as Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, or Language) and to propose a transversal integration. By the end of the lesson, participants can list the ESI NAP cores for the primary level, can explain how they build on the initial-level cores, and can identify at least one subject-area entry point for each core.
Lesson 6. Nucleos de Aprendizaje Prioritario for secondary. Consent, relationships, reproductive health and rights.
Participants examine the ESI NAP for the secondary level (adolescents aged 13 to 18 years) as defined in Res. CFE 340/18. The cores include: consent and the right to say no, healthy and respectful relationships, reproductive health and rights (including contraception and sexually transmitted infection prevention), gender-based violence prevention, and the exercise of sexual and reproductive rights. Participants analyze the legal framework that supports adolescent autonomy, including the intersection with Ley 26.061 (the child protection law) and the Civil and Commercial Code provisions on adolescent capacity. A case-study activity requires participants to design a secondary-level lesson on consent that respects adolescent developmental needs and legal rights. By the end of the lesson, participants can list the ESI NAP cores for the secondary level, can explain how consent and reproductive rights are grounded in law, and can design an age-appropriate lesson on one core.
Lesson 7. Constituting and running the ESI reference team. Interdisciplinary function and the link to jurisdictional teams.
Participants study the requirements of Res. CFE 340/18 for the school ESI reference team (equipo docente referente de ESI). The lesson covers the composition of the team (at least one teacher per level or cycle, with interdisciplinary representation), its functions (planning, advising, monitoring, and evaluating ESI implementation), and its relationship with the jurisdictional ESI team and the Ministry of Education. Participants analyze sample team charters and meeting protocols from Argentine schools. A simulation activity requires participants to role-play the first meeting of a newly formed ESI reference team, including agenda-setting, role allocation, and the creation of a work plan for the school year. By the end of the lesson, participants can describe the composition and functions of the ESI reference team, can explain how it links to jurisdictional structures, and can participate effectively in establishing or running such a team.
Lesson 8. Embedding ESI in the institutional project. Writing ESI into the school's plan and organizational norms.
Participants learn how to integrate ESI into the school's institutional project (Proyecto Institucional) and its organizational norms (normas de convivencia) as required by Res. CFE 340/18. The lesson covers the distinction between the ESI institutional plan (a specific document) and the broader institutional project, and it provides a template for writing ESI objectives, actions, and evaluation criteria into the school's planning documents. Participants examine examples of institutional projects from Argentine schools that have successfully embedded ESI. A writing exercise requires participants to draft a one-page ESI institutional plan for a hypothetical school, including objectives, activities, timeline, and evaluation indicators. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain why ESI must be embedded in the institutional project, can identify the key components of an ESI institutional plan, and can draft such a plan for their own school context.
Lesson 9. Gender equality and the prevention of gender violence. Classroom practice on equality and non-discrimination.
Participants examine the gender content of Ley 26.150 and the national ESI pillars, focusing on gender equality and the prevention of gender-based violence. The lesson covers the legal framework (including Ley 26.485 on the comprehensive protection of women and Ley 26.150's gender perspective), the concepts of gender stereotypes and their impact on students, and classroom strategies for promoting equality and preventing violence. Participants analyze case studies of gender-based discrimination and violence in school settings and practice designing interventions that address the root causes. A discussion activity requires participants to reflect on their own gender assumptions and how those assumptions might affect their teaching. By the end of the lesson, participants can define gender equality and gender-based violence in legal terms, can identify gender stereotypes in curricular materials and classroom interactions, and can design a classroom activity that promotes equality and non-discrimination.
Lesson 10. ESI and the protection of childhood. How ESI content surfaces disclosures and the interface with reporting duties.
Participants examine the intersection between ESI implementation and the mandatory reporting duty under Ley 26.061 Article 30. The lesson explains how ESI content (particularly on body care, rights, and trusted adults) can create a safe space in which students disclose abuse, neglect, or rights violations. Participants learn to recognize a disclosure, to respond appropriately without interrogating the child, and to follow the correct reporting pathway to the local rights-protection authority. The lesson emphasizes that the teacher's role is to receive and communicate, not to investigate. A scenario-based exercise requires participants to practice the correct response to a simulated disclosure during an ESI lesson. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain why ESI is a natural context for disclosures, can distinguish between a disclosure and a report, and can execute the correct reporting procedure under Ley 26.061.
Part III: Application and Mastery (Lessons 11-15)
Lesson 11. Working with families and the community on ESI. Managing consultation, misinformation and objections lawfully.
Participants learn strategies for engaging families and the community in ESI implementation while respecting the mandatory nature of the program. The lesson covers the legal principle that ESI is a student right that cannot be vetoed by parental objection, the distinction between consultation and consent, and techniques for managing misinformation and resistance. Participants analyze common objections raised by families in Argentine school contexts and practice developing responses that are legally accurate and respectful. A role-play activity requires participants to simulate a parent-teacher meeting about ESI content, with one participant playing the teacher and another playing a parent with concerns. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain the legal limits of parental authority over ESI, can respond to common objections with accurate legal references, and can conduct a productive conversation with a concerned family member.
Lesson 12. Digital ESI. Image rights, online consent, sexting and grooming prevention.
Participants examine the application of ESI to digital life, including image rights, online consent, sexting, and grooming prevention. The lesson draws on the national ESI framework and its extension to digital contexts, and it connects to Ley 26.061 Article 30 (the duty to communicate digital harms) and to the national cybersecurity and child protection policies. Participants analyze case studies of digital incidents in Argentine schools (such as non-consensual image sharing or online grooming) and practice designing ESI lessons that address digital consent and safety. A resource-evaluation activity requires participants to assess official digital ESI materials from the Ministry of Education and educ.ar. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain the key digital risks for children and adolescents, can design an ESI lesson on digital consent and safety, and can identify the correct reporting pathway for a digital harm.
Lesson 13. Inclusive ESI. Adapting ESI for students with disabilities and diverse learners.
Participants learn to adapt ESI content and methods for students with disabilities and diverse learners, using the framework of Res. CFE 311/16 (inclusive education) alongside Res. CFE 340/18. The lesson covers the principles of reasonable adjustments (ajustes razonables) and support configurations (configuraciones de apoyo) as they apply to ESI, including adjustments to language, materials, timing, and assessment. Participants examine examples of adapted ESI materials for students with intellectual disabilities, autism, sensory impairments, and communication difficulties. A design activity requires participants to adapt a standard ESI lesson for a specific student profile, documenting the adjustments made and their legal basis. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain the legal obligation to make ESI accessible to all students, can identify common barriers to ESI participation for students with disabilities, and can design reasonable adjustments for a specific learner.
Lesson 14. Selecting and evaluating ESI materials. Using official ESI resources and assessing quality and legality.
Participants develop criteria for selecting and evaluating ESI teaching materials, with a focus on using official resources from the Ministry of Education, the national ESI program, and educ.ar. The lesson covers the legal requirement that ESI materials must align with Ley 26.150 and Res. CFE 340/18, and it provides a rubric for assessing materials on accuracy, age-appropriateness, inclusivity, and legal compliance. Participants examine a range of official and unofficial ESI materials and practice applying the rubric. A curation exercise requires participants to build a small collection of approved ESI resources for a specific level and topic. By the end of the lesson, participants can list the official sources of ESI materials in Argentina, can evaluate a material against legal and pedagogical criteria, and can curate a set of resources for their own classroom or school.
Lesson 15. Evidencing ESI practice for the classification portfolio. Documenting ESI work as an accreditable antecedent.
Participants learn how to document their ESI training and practice as an accreditable antecedent for the jurisdictional classification board under Res. CFE 257/15. The lesson covers the types of evidence that classification boards typically accept (certificates, lesson plans, institutional plans, team participation records, student work samples) and the principles of building a coherent portfolio. Participants examine sample portfolios from Argentine teachers who have successfully claimed ESI points. A portfolio-building exercise requires participants to draft a portfolio entry for one ESI activity or project, including a reflective narrative and supporting documentation. By the end of the lesson, participants can explain how ESI training and practice convert to puntaje under Res. CFE 257/15, can identify the types of evidence that classification boards accept, and can assemble a defensible portfolio entry for their own ESI work.
This syllabus was designed from primary-source research of this nation's official teacher requirements and passed independent verification. The full course, its lessons, assistant, and materials are live for enrolled educators.