
A criterion-led pilot on accommodating and meeting the varied needs of English Learners, built on Minnesota's LEAPS Act, the WIDA framework, and explicit alignment with the InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards.

3 clock hours / 180 active minutes
English Language Learners · InTASC aligned
Self-paced online professional learning
20 questions · 80% to pass

Describe the linguistic, cultural, and educational variation among Minnesota's English Learners and explain why a single "EL strategy" cannot serve them all.

Explain the federal and Minnesota legal obligations that make EL accommodation a professional duty rather than an optional kindness.

State the five InTASC anchor standards used in this course and map each to a concrete English Learner instructional decision.

Interpret WIDA proficiency levels 1-6 and annual ACCESS results to plan instruction, and explain why a proficiency level describes language performance rather than academic capacity.

Distinguish conversational proficiency from academic language proficiency, identify the academic language demands of your own discipline, and apply the scholarly caveats that keep the distinction from becoming a deficit label.

Select input supports and scaffolds matched to a student's proficiency profile that make grade-level content understandable without simplifying the content itself.

Select high-value vocabulary for preteaching and construct sentence frames that rehearse the language functions of your discipline rather than fill-in-the-blank recall.

Design at least one instructional structure that invites strategic home-language use to deepen content learning and English development, and defend the practice to a skeptical colleague.

Adjust classroom assessments so that scores for English Learners reflect the intended learning target, and distinguish accommodations that preserve validity from changes that alter the construct.

Structure collaboration with a licensed EL teacher so that language and content expertise are combined in planning and instruction rather than divided into teacher and helper roles.

Plan family communication that uses qualified interpretation, avoids using students as interpreters for substantive matters, and treats multilingual families as educational partners.

Analyze three composite Minnesota cases and justify accommodations matched to each learner's actual profile, citing the InTASC standard each decision serves.

Produce a standards-aligned lesson plan that demonstrates accommodation for English Learners at two different proficiency levels and audits itself against the five anchor InTASC standards.
Answer all 20 scenario-based questions. The planned completion threshold is 80% (16 of 20). This reviewer copy shows feedback after submission; the deployed version must make the same threshold, scoring, feedback, and remediation rules consistent in the interface and server. Clock-hour credit, when this course is approved and live, follows Minnesota renewal rules. [S2, S3]