iTeachAI emblem
MN-PELSB-001

Differentiated Instruction in Minnesota Classrooms

Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series
iTeachAI Academy

A criterion-led pilot on accommodating curriculum for diverse learners, modifying curriculum for varied learning levels, and adapting curriculum to individual needs.

© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series1 / 16
Course at a glance

Differentiated Instruction in Minnesota Classrooms

  1. 1Start with the learning target and the learner
  2. 2Accommodate curriculum for diverse learners
  3. 3Modify curriculum for varied learning levels
  4. 4Adapt curriculum to individual needs
  5. 5Monitor progress and refine the decision
  6. 6Apply the framework

Clock hours

3 clock hours claimed; measured design demand approximately 272 active minutes

Mandatory area

Accommodating / modifying / adapting

Format

Self-paced online professional learning

Assessment

20 questions · 80% to pass

These slides are a review companion. Course completion requires the full lessons, activities, and assessment.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series2 / 16
Lesson 1.1

Differentiation is a decision process, not three separate student tracks

Learning objective

Identify a shared learning target, distinguish productive learner variability from deficit labels, and locate the barrier that makes the target inaccessible.

Start with the learning target and the learner
  • Differentiated instruction begins with a common question: What is the essential learning, and what is preventing this learner or group from reaching it?
  • A useful planning sequence has four parts: (1) name the essential target; (2) define what success will look or sound like; (3) identify an observable barrier using more than one source of...
  • Target: The essential knowledge, skill, or practice students are expected to develop.
  • Barrier: A mismatch between the learner and the current materials, task, environment, language demand, timing, or response mode.
  • Support: A deliberate change chosen to reduce the barrier while protecting dignity, agency, access, and progress.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series3 / 16
Lesson 1.2

Use the three terms precisely, and respect the decision boundary

Learning objective

Operationally distinguish accommodation, modification, and adaptation while recognizing that legal documents and local practice control the support a student receives.

Start with the learning target and the learner
  • PELSB's renewal rubric uses three verbs: accommodating, modifying, and adapting.
  • These distinctions help a teacher reason clearly, but they are not universal legal definitions.
  • Decision boundary. A classroom teacher may offer many universally available access supports and differentiate daily instruction.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series4 / 16
Lesson 2.1

Match an accommodation to the barrier, target, and context

Learning objective

Select and justify an accommodation that removes a documented barrier without invalidating the intended learning.

Accommodate curriculum for diverse learners
  • An accommodation is strong when the support, barrier, and target form a visible line of reasoning.
  • Accommodations should not erase productive challenge.
  • Use a five-question match test:
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series5 / 16
Lesson 2.2

Design accessible materials before adding individual workarounds

Learning objective

Redesign a classroom material for broader access while preserving required individual accommodations.

Accommodate curriculum for diverse learners
  • Universal design and individual accommodation work together.
  • For digital and print materials, use the following minimum design checks:
  • the UDL Guidelines invite teachers to vary engagement, representation, and action/expression.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series6 / 16
Lesson 3.1

Modify deliberately, never as a shortcut around instruction

Learning objective

Determine when a task adjustment preserves the target and when it changes the breadth, depth, complexity, output, or success criteria.

Modify curriculum for varied learning levels
  • Teachers routinely vary examples, grouping, practice quantity, scaffolds, and challenge.
  • Use the target-integrity test:
  • Example: All students analyze how a character's choices influence the plot.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series7 / 16
Lesson 3.2

Build a multi-level task without building a status ladder

Learning objective

Design pathways with meaningful thinking, transparent success criteria, student dignity, and opportunities to move based on evidence.

Modify curriculum for varied learning levels
  • Poorly differentiated tasks announce a status hierarchy: one group receives rich inquiry while another fills blanks; one group uses real materials while another receives a visibly “baby”...
  • Grading and reporting must match the target actually taught and the local policy.
  • Student voice is evidence.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series8 / 16
Lesson 4.1

Create an individual adaptation from a learner profile, not a disability label

Learning objective

Use strengths, needs, context, student voice, and multiple evidence sources to design an individualized adaptation.

Adapt curriculum to individual needs
  • An individualized adaptation should be traceable to a current need in a specific context.
  • Build a concise learner profile with six parts:
  • Then use the ADAPT cycle: A nchor the target; D escribe the barrier and strength; A lign the smallest effective change; P lan implementation and evidence; T est, talk, and tune.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series9 / 16
Lesson 4.2

Make the adaptation specific enough to implement consistently

Learning objective

Write an adaptation plan that another responsible educator can implement and monitor without guessing.

Adapt curriculum to individual needs
  • “Provide support as needed” is not an implementable adaptation.
  • Implementation fidelity is not rigid sameness.
  • Implementation research distinguishes several components of fidelity, and the distinctions matter in classrooms because each fails differently.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series10 / 16
Lesson 5.1

Measure access, learning, independence, and belonging

Learning objective

Choose a small set of indicators that show whether a support improves progress without creating a new barrier.

Monitor progress and refine the decision
  • A support is not successful merely because it was provided.
  • Collect a baseline when feasible, identify the review interval, and use a measure sensitive enough to detect change. [S25] “Student improved” is too vague.
  • Interpret cautiously. Improvement after a support does not prove the support caused the change; lack of immediate improvement does not prove the student is unable.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series11 / 16
Lesson 5.2

Collaborate without handing off responsibility

Learning objective

Prepare a concise evidence-based team communication that respects student/family expertise and clarifies implementation roles.

Monitor progress and refine the decision
  • Differentiation is shared professional work.
  • Use the BRIDGE brief:
  • A strong brief might ask: “Should the team review the response mode because the student can explain the concept orally with the visual model but written output remains a barrier despite six...
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series12 / 16
Lesson 6.1

Case lab: keep the target, name the change, defend the evidence

Learning objective

Analyze three learner cases and justify an accommodation, modification, or adaptation without using deficit assumptions.

Apply the framework
  • Case A: same target, access barrier.
  • Case B: required individual plan.
  • Case C: varied level and greater depth.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series13 / 16
Lesson 6.2

Capstone: build a defensible differentiated lesson plan

Learning objective

Produce a standards-aligned plan that demonstrates accommodation, modification analysis, individual adaptation, monitoring, and collaboration.

Apply the framework
  • The capstone is the course's professional-learning artifact.
  • The capstone is complete when every section is present, the same essential target can be traced through instruction and assessment, plan-required supports are respected, and every...
  • A compliant capstone fills every section; a strong capstone coheres.
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series14 / 16
Required assessment

Demonstrating what you learned

20
Questions
80%
Passing threshold
12
Lessons covered

Answer all 20 scenario-based questions. The planned completion threshold is 80% (16 of 20). This reviewer copy shows feedback after submission; the deployed version must make the same threshold, scoring, feedback, and remediation rules consistent in the interface and server.

© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series15 / 16
iTeachAI emblem

Thank you

janette.camacho@iteachai.co
MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series
© 2026 iTeachAI LLC. All rights reserved.MN-PELSB-001 · Minnesota PELSB Renewal Course Series16 / 16